top of page

Hillforts - A fan site

.

Sometimes you have to press enter/ return key, on your keyboard  on the address bar to go to a page after you pressed on it's link.

UFFING~2.JPG

Hillforts in Britain

and Ireland

The hillforts of Britain and Ireland, namely in the countries of  Scotland, Wales, England, Cornwall, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland and the Isle of Man, are the vast majority of the content of the subject of "hillforts".

 

With over 4,000 across these territories which dot the map from the Scilly Isles to the Shetland Islands.

 

​

 

They vary in type, and categorising exists for all of them. The categorisation can be by size. With there being some so small they verge on being classed as the equivalents of defended farmhouses. With on the other end the greatest hillfort in Britain, Maiden Castle, which covers 19 hectares, and to visualise that, a hectare is about 20 percent bigger than a football pitch, so a large area to be enclosed by.

 

The other best way of differentiating it, is by the geography. Most sit upon hilltops, and there are various ways they do this. Some on higher hills than others, some in the middle of plains, some overlooking a pass into a valley, and all sorts. Then some though categorised as hillforts, are more coastal forts. Some of these do sit upon low hills, but others really are small peninsulas, and are less a hill, than a peninsula fort, with a rampart and ditch cutting the enclosure off from potential assailants. This kind of thing can occur inland as well. With for instance a fort having just 1 side as a rampart and the rest being enclosed by natural cliffs, or even a lake to a extent.

                                                                                                    

Then there are specific details, that separate them, such as how many lines of ramparts, possibly one, maybe 2, maybe 3. Some luckier sites as mentioned just use a natural cliff on one side, or the sea, but usually add to the natural barrier in some way.

 

There are also varieties of wall construction, like rubble walls, akin to dry stone walling, or use of earthworks, with greater varieties found for some continental oppidum. Pen Y Gaer in North Wales, is famed for a rare, chevaux de frise, which would be stones pointing outwards, akin to a medieval anti-cavalry tactic, to ward off attacks from cavalry. Which is strange as in part of the Iron Age, certainly parts of Britain used chariots rather than cavalry. It must mean something there. In Scotland, some sites such as Tap o' Noth, contain a Scottish Iron Age peculiarity, the vitrified wall. For a as yet unproven reason, they themselves have seen their rocks, heated to temperatures that do not seem to have made the forts stronger, or even indicate attacks, but this is something only found in large numbers in North East Scotland, and at rarer levels as you get away from there. Other structural classifiers include varieties of gate, and their number, and the type of gate. Perhaps the popular in turning entrance, to watch over attackers, like at for instance Castell Cawr above Abergele, or the narrow overbearing entrances to Tre'r Ceiri, or the mighty double entrance at Maiden Castle, to name some examples. Other markers, that divide them into groups, the region they are from, and variety of how remote they are from other forts or Iron Age sites or rivers or population centres. Plus the biggest in some ways, likely population size, how many remnants of human population have been discovered or how many artefacts have been located there. A last example could be legends associated to them, and historical references, and which sites have been excavated, for example. Though what remains of a site is a great indicator as well, as Old Oswestry, and Maiden Castle, and Tre'r Ceiri, as such are examples of the best well preserved sites, go in different categories, to most, and even more so to the list of forts destroyed by quarrying or erosion. Even if some of those sites when they were around, would be more similar to say a example, like Penmaenmawr's Braich y Dinas, than to the still surviving Tre'r Ceiri.

 

​

With another truly important differentiation being the age of the fort. Some are Bronze Age, but the high water mark of hillforts was the Iron Age, when more and more were built. Across that era, especially before 100BC, Maiden Castle, and a number of other sites were reaching large populations, that could impress even a Roman with their size. So here there you have categorizing of them for era, early and mid and late Iron Age. A extra factor that marks them into groups, could be that there were later uses of some sites. Did it become a site for a Roman base, or even Norman or such style stone castles. As may have been the case for Edinburgh and Caergwrle castles, according to some indications that they had hillfort style defences long ago, before they became the ground for castle sites.

​

When the Romans came, England's forts in the main were turned over to other uses, some became part of farms, and many surely were left to go to ruin, after Rome attacked and harmed some in war, and some as a process of establishing their empire, damaged some as to make them unusable again.  A small number like Old Sarum, for a brief period became Roman forts, though in most cases Roman style walled towns were constructed, and also not right by hillforts. Though it is of interest that Maiden Castle had a temple built atop it, in the Roman times, as if symbolising a replacement of Celtic by Roman gods. I should not forget that whether Rome utilised a fort, or whether a fort has evidence of a Roman, or a other tribe's attack, or just evidence of Roman occupation, is another fine marker of differentiation.

​

Much of Wales, especially in the South East, also saw the dismantling of the idea of hillforts as a base, but strangely some forts remained or boomed in use such as the aforementioned Braich Y Dinas. More so, most of the mostly unconquered, Scotland, and wholly unconquered Ireland, retained their forts for centuries.

 

It must be said as south east England is a little less hilly than the majority of the rest of Britain, despite it always having a high population relative to Britain as a whole, it did not have as many hillforts as the rest of the island, relative to population densities. Though it always did have some dotted there, like Bigbury Camp, in Kent, and Trundle, in Susses, which was even before Rome, was being replaced by Chichester's pre Roman, proto town, as a Celtic centre.

 

Then when the Romans left southern Britain, and the Anglo Saxons came in, there was a regrowth of hillforts in the remaining parts of England controlled by the Brythonic "Britons", especially the South West, or what was pushed into modern Cornwall, and just about all of Wales. This in addition to Scotland, which had seen the hillforts survive strongly while southern Britain was ruled as a province and such of Rome.

 

​

Hillforts were used by figures that must have been the inspirations for the ancient British then Welsh, then Cambro/Breton/Norman stories of King Arthur in his fight against the Saxon invaders. They were of use, with aspects of old Roman towns, but in the end, other factors, saw the Anglo Saxons take more and more territory. I

 

t must be said by 1000AD other structures were being used in the main other than hillforts. Though some hillfort sites specially in Scotland and Wales, still had some element of use. Certainly the castle or structures like them, were coming into play, and replacing them from after then, mainly as of the arrival of the motte and bailey and stone castles of the Normans into the British Isles after ten sixty six, not that hillforts were so common in Wales and England by then anyway. Though in a sense some sites had a rebirth from this. Certainly in Wales, a large amount of castles are built on former hillfort sites, and some which do not, have a antecedence in many cases from near hillfort locations or sometimes even are on locations which speak of hillfort style locations, 

 

 

Another good way at differentiating them includes the names. Some have Welsh names, some English names, of which some stem from old Brythonic names. So there are a wide variety of differentiating ways.

 

 

The last great method of differentiation is purpose. Of course Maiden Castle must have been some kind of major population and power centre, but some sites, such as Marian Ffrith near Dyserth, or Mull of Galloway's enclosure, defy at this stage, the aim of determining effectively what they were specifically for. It has be stated that hillforts were not just army bases on a hill, and very few likely were. The majority must have been to a extent fortified villages, or hamlets, or farmsteads. With the military defensive aspect just a part of life. Some may have been mainly for guarding a pass, but for that matter, some, specially some very coastal ones, were mainly trade posts, with a rampart. Some for sure, were purely for ceremonial events, as some have speculated for Navan, Ingleborough, and for Uffington Castle. Some likely were animal enclosures, like many say Bindon Hill was purposed for, and some likely were unoccupied, and just left up there, for people to flee to in times of raids. I can imagine all were used for that purpose if need be, but some were just the equivalent of a air raid shelter in emergencies.  Then of course there may have been some that were unfinished and never occupied, like Ladle Hill, in Hampshire, was to such a extent, that it's half completed earthworks are glaringly noticeable to keen observers. Indeed some were possibly, like some of Caesar's constructions in Gaul, just temporary structures for one battle. Though considering armies then were likely more temporary, and smaller, that may be unlikely. Lastly some may have been a warlord, prince, or chief's palaces, or occupying garrisons, or even colonial forays into other territories. Or maybe even some Iron Age, revolutionary headquarters, but I just add that to say, alternatives. Or they even could have in small cases have been religious centres. I think mostly they were hilltop fortified villages, places for people to flee to in times of trouble or in some smaller cases, like Moel Arthur, guard point garrisons and such like.   

You know that is all I really need to say on the subject for now, and the pictures below are what I have on hillforts, That was really just to put bones on the subject of hillforts. My other pages go into more detail.

But here is the main thing to wet the appetite, they were not the barren sites you see today, they were more likely fully occupied, in many cases, with roundhouses, grain storage pits, and ramparts, and palisades, and all sorts of life going on around them. There would in many cases be a palisade surrounding the fort, and toughly constructed wooden gateways or entrances to the vast majority, that would have intimidated or welcomed arrivals for times past. Often they would be the central village of the community, and that should wet an appetite for reading more about them. My story which you can buy, is all about the events that could have occurred in and around them in the land of hundreds of hillforts, of so much variety and splendour.

So here are some pictures of hillforts. I should add, the story I have written has my adventure stepping into Wales, England, Scotland, Cornwall, Mann, the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Plus as mentioned elsewhere some travel onto the continent.

​

Constable.jpg
LOOKIN~2.JPG
Dinas Bran Hillfort  from up the valley
The ramparts of Moel Arthur, more up clo
FROMOU~1.JPG
Burghead Hillfort.jpg
Corwen Hillfort from the North.jpg
Dinas Emrys overlooking the valley with
The Llyn 3 peaks from the beach north of
Long rubble of the wall of the east abov
ANCIEN~1.JPG
PLAYMO~1.JPE
WAYUPT~1.JPE

Here is a list of all the pictures on this page.           

It is left to right then top to bottom. 

Most of my pictures here are Wales ones, but Wales is as good a sample area as any.

So first of all a ditch built as a protective ring with the rampart round Uffington Castle. It is a bit like many great hillfort's deep ditches. For scale this is a footpath aside it. I got the file off Wikimedia Commons, it is a public domain photo.

The next photo is a picture of Old Sarum, a painting by Constable, by assumption is such painting pictures as they are so old are public domain. 

Next is a picture by me so you need my permission to use it like all pics by me on this page, and others. It is of the walls at Holyhead's hillfort, looking over the modern harbour of Holyhead. The ferries to Ireland from this town are so big you can see them as specks on the horizon from about 40 mile away on Tre'r Ceiri in South West Gwynedd.

​

​

Below another picture of mine, of the silhouette of the ruins of Dinas Bran, the castle and hillfort above the town of Llangollen on the valley floor below.

Then Moel Arthur a hillfort on Clwydian Hills, a picture of mine, here you are in between the heather clad ramparts. There are a number of them on this steep compact little pinnacle.

Then here to the right is the entrance to Holyhead's hillfort, Caer y Twr, the walls are surrounding you here, so are pretty good. A thing about forts is they often make the entrance walls more intimidating partly as a sign of how impressive the fort is, and partly as that is always a relative weak spot that needs strength.

I did used to have pic here of where the Black Rocks fort was roughly. Now it is just a beach, or rather  a patch of land eroded away by the sea. There used to be a Dinas Dinlle sized feature here. It is in North Wales, Deganwy. It is another picture of mine. Whether it was a Celtic or Roman site is unsure.You can see what I mean by that by looking at those 2 underlined links in this paragraph.  

Then a 19th Century plan of Burghead hillfort, in North East Scotland, which you can see more about on it's link. . 

Then a picture of Corwen's Caer Drewyn hillfort, frpm the valley floor, looking up at it, you are north of it and the town of Corwen here.

Then a nice picture of the Dark Ages, dragon shaped, rocky hill of Dinas Emrys, near Beddgelert. It controlled this valley and was surely that of a local power. In legend it of Vortigen, from the tales associated with the long ago fought battles between the Saxons and the Britons, which just to make sure here, are of a past age. I mean as a Celt, I pride in that heritage, but I do not support any Anti Englishness, or any other form of xenophobia coming from me celebrating that Celtic heritage or any other form of racism, towards any group the world over, and especially anti Scottishness, or anti Welshness, but saying that I like celebrating the history, and think there is nothing wrong with remembering Scottish or Welsh battle wins, or victories in saving their identities, from some long ago feudal invader. I like to be proud of my country, and to like other people's countries, and even support internationalism. P.S the story about this piece of Beddgelert is that the fort was where a dragon dwelt, in fact it is shaped a little as a hill like a dragon, steep sided, with a neck, like narrowness leading into the rocky sides.

Then a picture of mine along the beach by Dinas Dinlle, with it on the left, and in the distance the peaks of the forts of the Lleyn Peninsula, another of mine.

Then another of my pictures of Caer Drewyn it's ancient Iron Age walls, along the battered grassy hilltop. Then another. You can really sense the ancientness, with the moss covering it, of this barren except for sheep, rise.

Then a fun picture of mine, it is of Moel Hiraddug, Dyserth, North Wales, on the western slope atop it, with me with a playmobile fence I took up there, to imagine for a photo what it would be like looking across the valley floor from up high gazing over the valley. Then lastly the same fort from the north, as you climb it. I have lots of pictures of this fort in my story, as of it being so close to myself. Then what is so good is that there is a hut on it, it is for the small mast, but I like how there may have been roundhouses resembling it in those very long ago times. So they are the pictures for this page, but as I say, Wales as I live there, or North Wales is a good sample site. It would seem more sensible to have the great forts on a page, like this, alone, but really the bright side of this, is Wales does have many good forts, and it is better to appreciate them as the great sights they are, just like the thousands across Britain are, rather than just see the biggest and then to look down on the vast majority of forts where most lived as comparatively minor. When really they as a big unit had more people, than the bigger forts, when all grouped together, and led more area. So the true hillfort exploration looks at both small and bigger forts. As I say, I look at both in these site and my story, and the bright side of me living in North Wales, is a I have a good sample area for the typical hillfort region. So that is that there then.

⭐ Summary: Certain hillfort names (with earliest certain dates)
Here are some names of utterly certain oldest names for some hillforts. 

I used Ai to help with this, but a, not totally certain, but I will put this article here anyhow. 

Hillfort Earliest Certain DateWhy Certain

Pen y Gaer 1699 Lhwyd’s plan matches the site exactly
Tre ceiri 1699, ditto, Braich y Dinas, ditto, Dinas Dinlle, Dinas Emrys, and Moel y Gaer (Llanbedr‑y‑Cennin), 

British Camp1809 Guidebooks + OS maps confirm the site

Maiden Castle 1811 Unique ramparts described precisely

Old Oswestry1813 Detailed antiquarian description
Cadbury Castle 18th Century

Classical writers like Ptolemy and Diodorus Siculus named settlements and rivers in Iron Age Britain, but never described hillforts, leaving later antiquarians to make speculative guesses about which earthworks those names might refer to. Thus Rerigonium (Ptolemy) was guessed to be Dunragit purely from phonetic similarity; Curia (Ptolemy) was linked to Traprain Law because it is the largest Votadini hill; Maridunum (Ptolemy) was attached to Merlin’s Hill because it sits near Roman Carmarthen; Bannatia (Ptolemy) was guessed as Burnswark due to its dramatic appearance; Vindocladia from Roman itineraries was projected onto Hod Hill because it contains a Roman fort; Tamara (Ptolemy) was linked to Castle Dore simply for being near the Tamar; and Ictis (Diodorus Siculus) was speculatively tied to St Michael’s Mount as a tidal island. Even Maiden Castle was guessed to be Ptolemy’s Dunium, though the text never mentions a hillfort. None of these identifications are secure: the classical sources give no maps, no topographical detail, and no descriptions of earthworks, meaning every association is a later scholarly guess rather than evidence.
Across Britain, only a small group of hillforts have names from Dark Age and medieval texts (c. 600–1500) that are likely tied to the exact sites we recognise today, because those sources occasionally name royal strongholds or legendary forts but rarely describe their physical form. The most secure examples come from early Scottish material: Dumbarton Rock is repeatedly named as Dun Breatann (“Fort of the Britons”) in Dark Age chronicles such as the Annals of Ulster and the Chronicle of the Kings of Alba, leaving little doubt that these texts refer to the same volcanic fortress still standing today. Dunadd appears in the Senchus fer n‑Alban and other early Gaelic records as the royal centre of Dál Riata, and because its name is unique and its role unmistakable, it is almost certainly the same fortified hill we see now. Welsh sites like Dinas Emrys (named in Historia Brittonum), Dinas Powys (12th‑century genealogies), Dinorben (medieval triads), and Dinas Dinlle (13th‑century lists) are probably the same hills we map today, though none of the texts give detailed descriptions of the earthworks. English sites like Caer Caradoc have no genuine medieval attestation at all. When you weigh the Dark Age sources honestly, Dunadd therefore wins the certainty battle: its early, repeated, and unique naming in Gaelic records makes it the most securely identifiable pre‑1500 hillfort name in Britain.
Across England, no hillforts have names recorded in Dark Age or medieval sources (1066–1500) that can be certainly tied to the exact earthworks we map today. Medieval English texts simply do not name Iron Age hillforts; when they mention “forts,” they mean castles, town defences, or ecclesiastical strongholds, never prehistoric ramparts. Even famous sites like Maiden Castle have medieval‑origin names, but the name was not applied to the hillfort itself with undoubted certainty until the 18th–19th century, making it historically iffy rather than “likely.” Old Oswestry is first described in the 19th century, Caer Caradoc is a post‑medieval antiquarian invention, and Ingleborough — although its name is ancient — has no medieval textual reference that identifies the hillfort on its summit. Classical names like Curia or Dunium have no medieval continuity and no physical descriptions, so they cannot be tied to any English hillfort with certainty. In short, England has no pre‑1500 textual hillfort names that are certain, and none that are even “likely” in the strong sense used for Scottish sites. The medieval record in England simply does not preserve hillfort names at all. Dunadd therefore wins the certainty battle by miles, because England has no comparable pre‑1500 hillfort name attested in Dark Age or medieval literature — not Maiden Castle, not Cadbury Castle, not Ingleborough, not any of them.
Across England, Wales, and Scotland, several hillforts sit beneath place‑names whose etymology is very likely pre‑1500 and in many cases pre‑1066, even though none of these names are securely applied to the hillforts in medieval texts. Maiden Castle is probably a medieval invention, possibly originating in medieval fictional or romance literature, and although it may reflect an older descriptive tradition, there is no certain evidence that the name was applied to the hillfort before the 18th–19th century. Ingleborough, often explained as Old English or Norse (Ingla‑burh, “fort of the Angles”), has an etymology that is likely pre‑1066, but this remains only a possible interpretation, and no medieval text identifies the summit hillfort. Tintagel, whose name almost certainly means “fort of the narrow place” from Brittonic Din Tagell, is very likely pre‑1066 in origin, and its meaning shows that ancient Celtic naming traditions survived into medieval spellings, but again the medieval texts refer to the headland and castle, not the prehistoric ramparts. Other sites like Badbury Rings, Burrough Hill, Danebury, and Castle Dore also have early English or Celtic name‑elements, yet none appear as hillforts in medieval writing. In short, Britain has many hillforts with likely pre‑1066 place‑name roots, but no certain medieval textual hillfort names, meaning their etymology is old but their identification is not.
Medieval maps and documents do record Badbury, Cadbury, Ingleborough, and similar names, showing that these place‑names themselves are very likely pre‑1500 and possibly pre‑1066, but they always refer to the settlement, manor, or district, never to the hillfort. Because the names are ancient and often contain early English or Brittonic elements, it is reasonable to infer that some English hillforts may preserve pre‑1066 naming traditions — but this remains only inference, not certain textual evidence, since medieval writers never explicitly applied these names to the prehistoric earthworks.
Ireland does have certain pre‑1500 hillfort or royal‑fort names, because early Irish literature and annals explicitly identify major prehistoric centres such as Emain Macha, Dún Ailinne, Tara, and Cashel. These names appear repeatedly in medieval texts, are unique, and refer to specific, identifiable earthworks, making them certain in a way English hillforts are not. Most other Irish hillforts only have likely pre‑1066 place‑names, but these major royal sites are securely attested in the medieval record.
The name “Cadbury Castle” itself does not appear in any medieval source, and Leland in 1542 only reports that locals called the hill Camelot, not “Cadbury Castle.” The earliest certain use of the name applied directly to the hillfort is 1723, when William Stukeley drew the ramparts and captioned his engraving “Prospect of Camalet Castle”, clearly identifying the prehistoric earthworks. The modern form “Cadbury Castle” emerges shortly afterwards in 18th‑century antiquarian writing, when scholars began standardising local place‑names and distinguishing the site from Cadbury Camp and Cadbury Hill. Thus the first certain naming of the hillfort as Cadbury Castle is early–mid 18th century, with Stukeley’s 1723 drawing providing the earliest secure anchor point.
The Domesday Book’s 1086 reference to Cadbury is certainly the name of the manor and settlement, not the hillfort, but because the settlement lies directly beneath the ramparts, and because the name means “Cadda’s fort” (from Cadan‑byrig), it is highly likely that the name originally referred to the hill and fort before it became the name of the village. What we lack is a medieval document that explicitly says “Cadbury Castle” or describes the earthworks. So the Domesday entry is certain for the place, and strongly suggestive for the hillfort, but not textually certain. In other words: the name is almost certainly ancient and originally hill‑based, but the link to the fort in 1086 is inferred, not proven.

​

bottom of page